Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Chris Creighton vs Charlie Bailey
Chris Creighton: 23rd pct vs Charlie Bailey: 20th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Charlie BaileyChris Creighton
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Charlie Bailey
Charlie Bailey: 38th pct vs Chris Creighton: 27th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Chris Creighton
Chris Creighton: 40th pct vs Charlie Bailey: 34th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Charlie Bailey vs Chris Creighton
Charlie Bailey: 0 titles vs Chris Creighton: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Charlie Bailey
Charlie Bailey: 14 seasons vs Chris Creighton: 12 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Chris Creighton
Chris Creighton: 43.2% vs Charlie Bailey: 30.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Chris Creighton has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeChris Creighton has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Charlie Bailey
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -15.3
14th pct
Lower end
Chris Creighton
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -11.3
24th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Charlie BaileyChris Creighton
EliteStrongAverageLean
Charlie Bailey: 1993 UTEP
1986Actual season year • SRS range -27.1 to 1.22025
Active comparison point
Charlie Bailey • 1987
1987 Memphis
Best seasonBiggest improvement5-5-1 • SRS 1.2 • SP Overall -2.8
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+19.6
SP Off / Def
22.0 / 25.0
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Chris Creighton
Nearest year 2014 • Eastern Michigan
2-10 • SRS -27.1 • SP Overall -25.9
Charlie Bailey holds a 28.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +4.2 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Bailey | |||||
| Memphis | 1986-1988 | 3 | 12-20-1 | -5.6Best quality | 1.2Highest peak |
| UTEP | 1993-1999 | 7 | 19-53-1 | -15.7 | -11.1 |
| Chris Creighton | |||||
| Eastern Michigan | 2014-2025 | 12 | 57-75 | -12.2 | -3.4Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Charlie Bailey
31-73-2 • 30.2% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
1.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Memphis 1987
SRS 1.2
Worst Season
UTEP 1995
SRS -25.1
Biggest Improvement
Memphis 1987
19.6 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Chris Creighton
57-75 • 43.2% • 12 seasons • 0 titles
40th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Eastern Michigan 2018
SRS -3.4
Worst Season
Eastern Michigan 2014
SRS -27.1
Biggest Improvement
Eastern Michigan 2016
13.8 SRS