Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Joker Phillips vs Cecil Ingram
Joker Phillips: 33rd pct vs Cecil Ingram: 31st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Cecil IngramJoker Phillips
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Joker Phillips
Joker Phillips: 42nd pct vs Cecil Ingram: 37th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Cecil Ingram
Cecil Ingram: 84th pct vs Joker Phillips: 77th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Cecil Ingram vs Joker Phillips
Cecil Ingram: 0 titles vs Joker Phillips: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Cecil Ingram vs Joker Phillips
Cecil Ingram: 3 seasons vs Joker Phillips: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Cecil Ingram vs Joker Phillips
Cecil Ingram: 36.4% vs Joker Phillips: 35.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Joker Phillips has the edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Narrow edgeJoker Phillips has the edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Cecil Ingram
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -5.1
41th pct
Mixed
Joker Phillips
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -2.6
48th pct
Mixed
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Cecil IngramJoker Phillips
EliteStrongAverageLean
1970Actual season year • SRS range -9.0 to 3.22012
Active comparison point
Cecil Ingram • 1971
1971 Clemson
Best seasonBiggest improvement5-6 • SRS 0.9 • SP Overall -2.7
Win %
45.5%
YoY SRS
+9.9
SP Off / Def
17.8 / 20.2
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Joker Phillips
Nearest year 2010 • Kentucky
6-7 • SRS 3.2 • SP Overall 6.0
Cecil Ingram trails by a 2.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -16.8 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecil Ingram | |||||
| Clemson | 1970-1972 | 3 | 12-21 | -3.9 | 0.9 |
| Joker Phillips | |||||
| Kentucky | 2010-2012 | 3 | 13-24 | -3.4 | 3.2Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Cecil Ingram
12-21 • 36.4% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
84th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Clemson 1971
SRS 0.9
Worst Season
Clemson 1970
SRS -9.0
Biggest Improvement
Clemson 1971
9.9 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Joker Phillips
13-24 • 35.1% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
3.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Kentucky 2010
SRS 3.2
Worst Season
Kentucky 2012
SRS -7.6
Biggest Improvement
Kentucky 2012
-1.7 SRS