Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Edward Donahue
Edward Donahue: 45th pct vs Kyle Flood: 42nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Edward DonahueKyle Flood
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Kyle Flood vs Edward Donahue
Kyle Flood: 46th pct vs Edward Donahue: 43rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Kyle Flood
Kyle Flood: 65th pct vs Edward Donahue: 57th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Edward Donahue vs Kyle Flood
Edward Donahue: 0 titles vs Kyle Flood: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Edward Donahue vs Kyle Flood
Edward Donahue: 4 seasons vs Kyle Flood: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Edward Donahue
Edward Donahue: 62.5% vs Kyle Flood: 52.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Kyle Flood sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeKyle Flood sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Edward Donahue
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Kyle Flood
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -4.9
42th pct
Mixed
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Edward DonahueKyle Flood
EliteStrongAverageLean
1917Actual season year • SRS range -11.5 to 4.72015
Active comparison point
Edward Donahue • 1917
1917 Clemson
Best season6-2 • SRS 3.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
75.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Kyle Flood
Nearest year 2012 • Rutgers
9-4 • SRS 4.7 • SP Overall 0.0
Edward Donahue trails by a 1.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward Donahue | |||||
| Clemson | 1917-1920 | 4 | 21-12-3 | -3.8 | 3.7 |
| Kyle Flood | |||||
| Rutgers | 2012-2015 | 4 | 27-24 | -2.9 | 4.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Edward Donahue
21-12-3 • 62.5% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
45th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Clemson 1917
SRS 3.7
Worst Season
Clemson 1920
SRS -11.5
Biggest Improvement
Clemson 1920
-7.9 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Kyle Flood
27-24 • 52.9% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
65th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Rutgers 2012
SRS 4.7
Worst Season
Rutgers 2013
SRS -9.0
Biggest Improvement
Rutgers 2014
9.4 SRS