Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Tom Hayes
Tom Hayes: 19th pct vs Sal Sunseri: 13th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Sal SunseriTom Hayes
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Tom Hayes vs Sal Sunseri
Tom Hayes: 15th pct vs Sal Sunseri: 15th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Sal Sunseri vs Tom Hayes
Sal Sunseri: 0 titles vs Tom Hayes: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Sal Sunseri vs Tom Hayes
Sal Sunseri: 1 seasons vs Tom Hayes: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Tom Hayes
Tom Hayes: 33.3% vs Sal Sunseri: 0.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tom Hayes has the decisive edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeTom Hayes has the decisive edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Sal Sunseri
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -14.4
16th pct
Lower end
Tom Hayes
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -6.8
36th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Sal SunseriTom Hayes
EliteStrongAverageLean
1992Actual season year • SRS range -10.7 to -10.52001
Active comparison point
Sal Sunseri • 1992
1992 Pittsburgh
Best seasonWorst season0-1 • SRS -10.7 • SP Overall -14.4
Win %
0.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
30.7 / 41.0
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Tom Hayes
Nearest year 2001 • Kansas
1-2 • SRS -10.5 • SP Overall -6.8
Sal Sunseri trails by a 0.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +0.3 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sal Sunseri | |||||
| Pittsburgh | 1992-1992 | 1 | 0-1 | -10.7 | -10.7 |
| Tom Hayes | |||||
| Kansas | 2001-2001 | 1 | 1-2 | -10.5 | -10.5 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Sal Sunseri
0-1 • 0.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Pittsburgh 1992
SRS -10.7
Worst Season
Pittsburgh 1992
SRS -10.7
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Higher career quality
Full profile →Tom Hayes
1-2 • 33.3% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
19th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Kansas 2001
SRS -10.5
Worst Season
Kansas 2001
SRS -10.5
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—