Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: John Moorhead vs Bill Wasmund
John Moorhead: 72nd pct vs Bill Wasmund: 71st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
John MoorheadBill Wasmund
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: John Moorhead vs Bill Wasmund
John Moorhead: 62nd pct vs Bill Wasmund: 62nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bill Wasmund vs John Moorhead
Bill Wasmund: 0 titles vs John Moorhead: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Bill Wasmund vs John Moorhead
Bill Wasmund: 1 seasons vs John Moorhead: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: John Moorhead
John Moorhead: 80.0% vs Bill Wasmund: 75.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
John Moorhead
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Bill Wasmund
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
John MoorheadBill Wasmund
EliteStrongAverageLean
1907Actual season year • SRS range 10.0 to 10.11910
Active comparison point
John Moorhead • 1907
1907 Pittsburgh
Best seasonWorst season8-2 • SRS 10.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
80.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Bill Wasmund
Nearest year 1910 • Texas
6-2 • SRS 10.0 • SP Overall —
John Moorhead holds a 0.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Moorhead | |||||
| Pittsburgh | 1907-1907 | 1 | 8-2 | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Bill Wasmund | |||||
| Texas | 1910-1910 | 1 | 6-2 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →John Moorhead
8-2 • 80.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Pittsburgh 1907
SRS 10.1
Worst Season
Pittsburgh 1907
SRS 10.1
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Bill Wasmund
6-2 • 75.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Texas 1910
SRS 10.0
Worst Season
Texas 1910
SRS 10.0
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.