Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Carl DePasqua vs Joe McMullen
Carl DePasqua: 27th pct vs Joe McMullen: 25th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Carl DePasquaJoe McMullen
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Joe McMullen vs Carl DePasqua
Joe McMullen: 30th pct vs Carl DePasqua: 28th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Carl DePasqua
Carl DePasqua: 98th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Carl DePasqua vs Joe McMullen
Carl DePasqua: 0 titles vs Joe McMullen: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Carl DePasqua
Carl DePasqua: 4 seasons vs Joe McMullen: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Carl DePasqua
Carl DePasqua: 30.9% vs Joe McMullen: 23.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Joe McMullen has the decisive edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeJoe McMullen has the decisive edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Carl DePasqua
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -5.8
39th pct
Lower end
Joe McMullen
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 0.3
58th pct
Above average
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Carl DePasquaJoe McMullen
EliteStrongAverageLean
1969Actual season year • SRS range -7.4 to -2.31972
Active comparison point
Carl DePasqua • 1970
1970 Pittsburgh
Best seasonBiggest improvement5-5 • SRS -3.2 • SP Overall -3.9
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+0.1
SP Off / Def
24.0 / 27.8
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Joe McMullen
Nearest year 1970 • San José State
1-2 • SRS -2.3 • SP Overall 0.3
Carl DePasqua trails by a 0.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -4.0 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl DePasqua | |||||
| Pittsburgh | 1969-1972 | 4 | 13-29 | -4.3 | -3.2Longest stop |
| Joe McMullen | |||||
| San José State | 1969-1970 | 2 | 3-10 | -4.8 | -2.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Longer run
Full profile →Carl DePasqua
13-29 • 30.9% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
4 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
Pittsburgh 1970
SRS -3.2
Worst Season
Pittsburgh 1972
SRS -7.1
Biggest Improvement
Pittsburgh 1970
0.1 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Joe McMullen
3-10 • 23.1% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
San José State 1970
SRS -2.3
Worst Season
San José State 1969
SRS -7.4
Biggest Improvement
San José State 1970
5.1 SRS