Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Dick Tomey
Dick Tomey: 70th pct vs Ray Morrison: 62nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Ray MorrisonDick Tomey
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Ray Morrison
Ray Morrison: 93rd pct vs Dick Tomey: 79th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Dick Tomey
Dick Tomey: 15th pct vs Ray Morrison: 3rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dick Tomey vs Ray Morrison
Dick Tomey: 0 titles vs Ray Morrison: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dick Tomey vs Ray Morrison
Dick Tomey: 33 seasons vs Ray Morrison: 33 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Ray Morrison
Ray Morrison: 57.9% vs Dick Tomey: 55.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Dick Tomey sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeDick Tomey sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Ray Morrison
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Dick Tomey
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.3
68th pct
Above average
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Ray MorrisonDick Tomey
EliteStrongAverageLean
Ray Morrison: 1918 VanderbiltRay Morrison: 1922 SMURay Morrison: 1935 VanderbiltRay Morrison: 1940 TempleDick Tomey: 1987 ArizonaDick Tomey: 2005 San José State
1916Actual season year • SRS range -41.1 to 25.42009
Active comparison point
Ray Morrison • 1927
1927 SMU
Best season7-2 • SRS 25.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
77.8%
YoY SRS
+15.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Dick Tomey
Nearest year 1977 • Hawai'i
5-6 • SRS -2.7 • SP Overall -2.0
Ray Morrison holds a 28.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray Morrison | |||||
| SMU | 1916-1934 | 14 | 82-39-22 | 7.0 | 25.4Highest peak |
| Vanderbilt | 1918-1939 | 6 | 29-22-2 | 7.0 | 12.0 |
| Temple | 1940-1948 | 9 | 31-38-9 | -6.5 | 3.6 |
| Dick Tomey | |||||
| Hawai'i | 1977-1986 | 10 | 63-46-3 | -0.1 | 13.4 |
| Arizona | 1987-2000 | 14 | 95-64-4 | 8.0Best quality | 17.4 |
| San José State | 2005-2009 | 5 | 25-35 | -13.7 | -2.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Ray Morrison
142-99-33 • 57.9% • 29 seasons • 0 titles
25.4 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
SMU 1927
SRS 25.4
Worst Season
SMU 1916
SRS -41.1
Biggest Improvement
SMU 1927
15.0 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Dick Tomey
183-145-7 • 55.7% • 29 seasons • 0 titles
-21.2 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Arizona 1993
SRS 17.4
Worst Season
San José State 2009
SRS -21.2
Biggest Improvement
San José State 2006
17.7 SRS