Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Michael Haywood
Michael Haywood: 16th pct vs Stan Drayton: 12th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Stan DraytonMichael Haywood
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Stan Drayton vs Michael Haywood
Stan Drayton: 16th pct vs Michael Haywood: 13th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Stan Drayton
Stan Drayton: 84th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Michael Haywood vs Stan Drayton
Michael Haywood: 0 titles vs Stan Drayton: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Stan Drayton vs Michael Haywood
Stan Drayton: 3 seasons vs Michael Haywood: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Michael Haywood
Michael Haywood: 40.0% vs Stan Drayton: 26.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Michael Haywood has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeMichael Haywood has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Stan Drayton
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -18.1
10th pct
Lower end
Michael Haywood
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -12.8
20th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Stan DraytonMichael Haywood
EliteStrongAverageLean
2009Actual season year • SRS range -19.7 to -10.22024
Active comparison point
Stan Drayton • 2022
2022 Temple
Best season3-9 • SRS -10.2 • SP Overall -12.9
Win %
25.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
16.3 / 28.6
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Michael Haywood
Nearest year 2010 • Miami (OH)
9-4 • SRS -11.2 • SP Overall -6.7
Stan Drayton holds a 1.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -5.6 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Drayton | |||||
| Temple | 2022-2024 | 3 | 9-25 | -15.6 | -10.2 |
| Michael Haywood | |||||
| Miami (OH) | 2009-2010 | 2 | 10-15 | -15.4 | -11.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Stan Drayton
9-25 • 26.5% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
84th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Temple 2022
SRS -10.2
Worst Season
Temple 2023
SRS -19.6
Biggest Improvement
Temple 2024
2.6 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Michael Haywood
10-15 • 40.0% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
16th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Miami (OH) 2010
SRS -11.2
Worst Season
Miami (OH) 2009
SRS -19.7
Biggest Improvement
Miami (OH) 2010
8.5 SRS