Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Jim Miller
Jim Miller: 49th pct vs Rod Carey: 44th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Rod CareyJim Miller
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Jim Miller
Jim Miller: 59th pct vs Rod Carey: 47th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Rod Carey vs Jim Miller
Rod Carey: 47th pct vs Jim Miller: 45th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Jim Miller vs Rod Carey
Jim Miller: 0 titles vs Rod Carey: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Rod Carey vs Jim Miller
Rod Carey: 10 seasons vs Jim Miller: 9 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Jim Miller
Jim Miller: 60.5% vs Rod Carey: 56.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Rod Carey sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeRod Carey sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Rod Carey
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -0.6
54th pct
Mixed
Jim Miller
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Rod CareyJim Miller
EliteStrongAverageLean
Rod Carey: 2019 TempleJim Miller: 1962 Boston College
1959Actual season year • SRS range -19.7 to 9.22021
Active comparison point
Rod Carey • 2012
2012 Northern Illinois
Best season0-1 • SRS 5.1 • SP Overall 12.4
Win %
0.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
35.6 / 25.4
Finish
#22
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jim Miller
Nearest year 1967 • Boston College
4-6 • SRS -10.9 • SP Overall —
Rod Carey holds a 16.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rod Carey | |||||
| Northern Illinois | 2012-2018 | 7 | 52-30 | -0.4Best quality | 5.1 |
| Temple | 2019-2021 | 3 | 12-20 | -11.2 | -2.7 |
| Jim Miller | |||||
| Detroit Mercy | 1959-1961 | 3 | 18-10 | -4.6 | -3.2 |
| Boston College | 1962-1967 | 6 | 34-24 | -1.9 | 9.2Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Rod Carey
64-50 • 56.1% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Northern Illinois 2012
SRS 5.1
Worst Season
Temple 2021
SRS -19.7
Biggest Improvement
Northern Illinois 2015
4.7 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Jim Miller
52-34 • 60.5% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
9.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Boston College 1962
SRS 9.2
Worst Season
Boston College 1966
SRS -15.1
Biggest Improvement
Boston College 1962
13.6 SRS