Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Samuel NewtonMario Cristobal

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Clear edge

Edge: Mario Cristobal

Mario Cristobal: 68th pct vs Samuel Newton: 58th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Decisive edge

Edge: Mario Cristobal

Mario Cristobal: 89th pct vs Samuel Newton: 72nd pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Similar

Similar: Samuel Newton vs Mario Cristobal

Samuel Newton: 5th pct vs Mario Cristobal: 3rd pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Mario Cristobal vs Samuel Newton

Mario Cristobal: 0 titles vs Samuel Newton: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Clear edge

Edge: Mario Cristobal

Mario Cristobal: 19 seasons vs Samuel Newton: 16 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Clear edge

Edge: Samuel Newton

Samuel Newton: 60.2% vs Mario Cristobal: 52.8%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Mario Cristobal sets the reference point in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Mario Cristobal sets the reference point in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Samuel Newton

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Mario Cristobal

Mixed

Raw avg SP Overall: -2.2

49th pct

Mixed

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Samuel NewtonMario Cristobal
EliteStrongAverageLean
Samuel Newton: 1898 LafayetteSamuel Newton: 1898 Penn StateSamuel Newton: 1899 LafayetteSamuel Newton: 1902 LehighSamuel Newton: 1911 LafayetteMario Cristobal: 2018 OregonMario Cristobal: 2022 Miami
1896Actual season year • SRS range -26.7 to 22.22025

Active comparison point

Samuel Newton1899

Selected

1899 Lafayette

Best seasonNew stop: Lafayette

12-1 • SRS 14.2 • SP Overall

Win %

92.3%

YoY SRS

+11.1

SP Off / Def

/

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Mario Cristobal

Nearest year 2007Florida International

Profile

1-11 • SRS -20.4 • SP Overall -32.9

Samuel Newton holds a 34.6-point SRS edge at this point.

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Samuel Newton
Penn State1896-1898312-14-0.13.1
Lafayette1898-1911541-167.114.2
Lehigh1902-1905423-20-2-3.612.3
Mario Cristobal
Florida International2007-2012627-47-11.5-5.8
Oregon2018-2021435-1212.0Best quality21.0
Miami2022-2025422-1610.522.2Highest peak

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Similar overall level

Samuel Newton

76-50-260.2%12 seasons • 0 titles

This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.

Full profile →

Best Season

Lafayette 1899

SRS 14.2

Worst Season

Lehigh 1905

SRS -26.7

Biggest Improvement

Lafayette 1911

35.3 SRS

Higher ceiling

Mario Cristobal

84-7552.8%14 seasons • 0 titles

22.2 peak SRS at the top end.

Full profile →

Best Season

Miami 2025

SRS 22.2

Worst Season

Florida International 2007

SRS -20.4

Biggest Improvement

Oregon 2018

16.6 SRS