Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Walter McCornack
Walter McCornack: 77th pct vs Tom Fennell: 73rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Tom FennellWalter McCornack
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Walter McCornack vs Tom Fennell
Walter McCornack: 83rd pct vs Tom Fennell: 81st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Walter McCornack
Walter McCornack: 61st pct vs Tom Fennell: 38th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Tom Fennell vs Walter McCornack
Tom Fennell: 0 titles vs Walter McCornack: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Tom Fennell vs Walter McCornack
Tom Fennell: 5 seasons vs Walter McCornack: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Walter McCornack
Walter McCornack: 80.9% vs Tom Fennell: 65.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tom Fennell
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Walter McCornack
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Tom FennellWalter McCornack
EliteStrongAverageLean
Walter McCornack: 1903 Northwestern
1901Actual season year • SRS range -2.7 to 19.51908
Active comparison point
Tom Fennell • 1908
1908 Penn State
Best season5-5 • SRS 18.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+7.0
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Walter McCornack
Nearest year 1905 • Northwestern
8-2-1 • SRS 19.5 • SP Overall —
Tom Fennell trails by a 1.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Fennell | |||||
| Penn State | 1904-1908 | 5 | 33-17-1 | 11.4 | 18.3Longest stop |
| Walter McCornack | |||||
| Dartmouth | 1901-1902 | 2 | 16-3-1 | 14.5Best quality | 15.0 |
| Northwestern | 1903-1905 | 3 | 26-5-4 | 9.5 | 19.5Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Tom Fennell
33-17-1 • 65.7% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Penn State 1908
SRS 18.3
Worst Season
Penn State 1905
SRS -2.7
Biggest Improvement
Penn State 1906
19.4 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →Walter McCornack
42-8-5 • 80.9% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
61st pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Northwestern 1905
SRS 19.5
Worst Season
Northwestern 1904
SRS 3.9
Biggest Improvement
Northwestern 1905
15.6 SRS