Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Enoch Bagshaw
Enoch Bagshaw: 74th pct vs Paul Schissler: 70th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Paul SchisslerEnoch Bagshaw
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Paul Schissler vs Enoch Bagshaw
Paul Schissler: 85th pct vs Enoch Bagshaw: 85th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Enoch Bagshaw vs Paul Schissler
Enoch Bagshaw: 66th pct vs Paul Schissler: 66th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Enoch Bagshaw vs Paul Schissler
Enoch Bagshaw: 0 titles vs Paul Schissler: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Enoch Bagshaw vs Paul Schissler
Enoch Bagshaw: 9 seasons vs Paul Schissler: 9 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Enoch Bagshaw
Enoch Bagshaw: 73.6% vs Paul Schissler: 61.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Paul Schissler
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Enoch Bagshaw
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Paul SchisslerEnoch Bagshaw
EliteStrongAverageLean
1921Actual season year • SRS range -0.6 to 20.31932
Active comparison point
Paul Schissler • 1928
1928 Oregon State
Best seasonBiggest improvement6-3 • SRS 20.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
66.7%
YoY SRS
+13.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Enoch Bagshaw
Nearest year 1928 • Washington
7-4 • SRS 8.6 • SP Overall —
Paul Schissler holds a 11.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Schissler | |||||
| Oregon State | 1924-1932 | 9 | 48-30-2 | 9.2 | 20.3 |
| Enoch Bagshaw | |||||
| Washington | 1921-1929 | 9 | 64-21-6 | 9.1 | 20.1 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Paul Schissler
48-30-2 • 61.3% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Oregon State 1928
SRS 20.3
Worst Season
Oregon State 1924
SRS -0.6
Biggest Improvement
Oregon State 1928
13.1 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Enoch Bagshaw
64-21-6 • 73.6% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
74th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Washington 1925
SRS 20.1
Worst Season
Washington 1921
SRS 0.6
Biggest Improvement
Washington 1925
11.9 SRS