Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Joseph Pipal
Joseph Pipal: 19th pct vs Rickey Bustle: 16th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Joseph PipalRickey Bustle
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Rickey Bustle
Rickey Bustle: 17th pct vs Joseph Pipal: 13th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Joseph Pipal
Joseph Pipal: 96th pct vs Rickey Bustle: 92nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Joseph Pipal vs Rickey Bustle
Joseph Pipal: 0 titles vs Rickey Bustle: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Joseph Pipal
Joseph Pipal: 11 seasons vs Rickey Bustle: 9 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Joseph Pipal
Joseph Pipal: 46.2% vs Rickey Bustle: 38.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Rickey Bustle sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeRickey Bustle sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Joseph Pipal
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Rickey Bustle
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -19.9
7th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Joseph PipalRickey Bustle
EliteStrongAverageLean
Joseph Pipal: 1916 Oregon State
1907Actual season year • SRS range -20.5 to -9.02010
Active comparison point
Joseph Pipal • 1916
1916 Oregon State
Best seasonBiggest improvementNew stop: Oregon State4-5 • SRS -11.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
44.4%
YoY SRS
+2.5
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Rickey Bustle
Nearest year 2002 • Louisiana
3-9 • SRS -15.5 • SP Overall -19.6
Joseph Pipal holds a 4.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Pipal | |||||
| Dickinson (PA) | 1907-1907 | 1 | 3-6-1 | -14.0 | -14.0 |
| Oregon State | 1916-1917 | 2 | 8-7-1 | -14.3 | -11.5 |
| Rickey Bustle | |||||
| Louisiana | 2002-2010 | 9 | 41-65 | -15.3 | -9.0Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Joseph Pipal
11-13-2 • 46.2% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
-17.1 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Oregon State 1916
SRS -11.5
Worst Season
Oregon State 1917
SRS -17.1
Biggest Improvement
Oregon State 1916
2.5 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Rickey Bustle
41-65 • 38.7% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
-9.0 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Louisiana 2008
SRS -9.0
Worst Season
Louisiana 2010
SRS -20.5
Biggest Improvement
Louisiana 2008
5.3 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.