Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Clem Crowe
Clem Crowe: 43rd pct vs F Dry: 39th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
F DryClem Crowe
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: F Dry
F Dry: 56th pct vs Clem Crowe: 51st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: F Dry
F Dry: 59th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Clem Crowe vs F Dry
Clem Crowe: 0 titles vs F Dry: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Clem Crowe vs F Dry
Clem Crowe: 11 seasons vs F Dry: 11 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Clem Crowe
Clem Crowe: 44.4% vs F Dry: 38.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
F Dry sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeF Dry sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
F Dry
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -2.9
47th pct
Mixed
Clem Crowe
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
F DryClem Crowe
EliteStrongAverageLean
F Dry: 1977 TCUClem Crowe: 1945 Iowa
1935Actual season year • SRS range -12.9 to 7.81982
Active comparison point
F Dry • 1974
1974 Tulsa
Best seasonBiggest improvement8-3 • SRS 7.8 • SP Overall 10.3
Win %
72.7%
YoY SRS
+10.4
SP Off / Def
31.5 / 22.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Clem Crowe
Nearest year 1945 • Iowa
2-7 • SRS -6.0 • SP Overall —
F Dry holds a 13.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F Dry | |||||
| Tulsa | 1972-1976 | 5 | 31-18-1 | 1.7 | 7.8Highest peak |
| TCU | 1977-1982 | 6 | 12-51-3 | -4.0 | 2.1 |
| Clem Crowe | |||||
| Xavier | 1935-1935 | 1 | 6-3 | 6.2Best quality | 6.2 |
| Iowa | 1945-1945 | 1 | 2-7 | -6.0 | -6.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →F Dry
43-69-4 • 38.8% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
7.8 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Tulsa 1974
SRS 7.8
Worst Season
TCU 1977
SRS -12.9
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 1974
10.4 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Clem Crowe
8-10 • 44.4% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
-6.0 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Xavier 1935
SRS 6.2
Worst Season
Iowa 1945
SRS -6.0
Biggest Improvement
Iowa 1945
-12.2 SRS