Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Robert Dobbs vs Marchy Schwartz
Robert Dobbs: 50th pct vs Marchy Schwartz: 48th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Robert DobbsMarchy Schwartz
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Robert Dobbs vs Marchy Schwartz
Robert Dobbs: 80th pct vs Marchy Schwartz: 80th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Robert Dobbs
Robert Dobbs: 16th pct vs Marchy Schwartz: 11th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Marchy Schwartz vs Robert Dobbs
Marchy Schwartz: 0 titles vs Robert Dobbs: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Robert Dobbs
Robert Dobbs: 18 seasons vs Marchy Schwartz: 16 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Robert Dobbs
Robert Dobbs: 52.9% vs Marchy Schwartz: 48.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Robert Dobbs sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeRobert Dobbs sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Robert Dobbs
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -13.4
19th pct
Lower end
Marchy Schwartz
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Robert DobbsMarchy Schwartz
EliteStrongAverageLean
Robert Dobbs: 1965 UTEPMarchy Schwartz: 1942 Stanford
1935Actual season year • SRS range -22.7 to 18.01972
Active comparison point
Robert Dobbs • 1967
1967 UTEP
Best season7-2-1 • SRS 18.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
75.0%
YoY SRS
+8.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Marchy Schwartz
Nearest year 1950 • Stanford
5-3-2 • SRS 9.1 • SP Overall —
Robert Dobbs holds a 8.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Dobbs | |||||
| Tulsa | 1955-1960 | 6 | 30-28-2 | -3.7 | 5.7 |
| UTEP | 1965-1972 | 8 | 41-35-2 | -1.5 | 18.0Longest stop |
| Marchy Schwartz | |||||
| Creighton | 1935-1939 | 5 | 19-22-2 | -10.3 | 0.8 |
| Stanford | 1942-1950 | 6 | 28-28-4 | 5.3Best quality | 17.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Robert Dobbs
71-63-4 • 52.9% • 14 seasons • 0 titles
16th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
UTEP 1967
SRS 18.0
Worst Season
UTEP 1972
SRS -22.7
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 1958
15.0 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →Marchy Schwartz
47-50-6 • 48.5% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
-17.8 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Stanford 1949
SRS 17.9
Worst Season
Creighton 1937
SRS -17.8
Biggest Improvement
Stanford 1942
20.6 SRS