Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Gus Farwick
Gus Farwick: 16th pct vs Bill Horr: 10th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Gus FarwickBill Horr
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Gus Farwick vs Bill Horr
Gus Farwick: 8th pct vs Bill Horr: 7th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bill Horr vs Gus Farwick
Bill Horr: 0 titles vs Gus Farwick: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Bill Horr vs Gus Farwick
Bill Horr: 1 seasons vs Gus Farwick: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Gus Farwick
Gus Farwick: 44.4% vs Bill Horr: 30.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Gus Farwick
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Bill Horr
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Gus FarwickBill Horr
EliteStrongAverageLean
1909Actual season year • SRS range -16.4 to -16.11932
Active comparison point
Gus Farwick • 1932
1932 Arizona
Best seasonWorst season4-5 • SRS -16.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
44.4%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Bill Horr
Nearest year 1909 • Northwestern
1-3-1 • SRS -16.4 • SP Overall —
Gus Farwick holds a 0.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gus Farwick | |||||
| Arizona | 1932-1932 | 1 | 4-5 | -16.1 | -16.1 |
| Bill Horr | |||||
| Northwestern | 1909-1909 | 1 | 1-3-1 | -16.4 | -16.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Gus Farwick
4-5 • 44.4% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
16th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Arizona 1932
SRS -16.1
Worst Season
Arizona 1932
SRS -16.1
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Bill Horr
1-3-1 • 30.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Northwestern 1909
SRS -16.4
Worst Season
Northwestern 1909
SRS -16.4
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.