Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Mark McMahon
Mark McMahon: 37th pct vs Frank Wickhorst: 25th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Mark McMahonFrank Wickhorst
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Mark McMahon vs Frank Wickhorst
Mark McMahon: 26th pct vs Frank Wickhorst: 26th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Frank Wickhorst vs Mark McMahon
Frank Wickhorst: 0 titles vs Mark McMahon: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Frank Wickhorst vs Mark McMahon
Frank Wickhorst: 1 seasons vs Mark McMahon: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Mark McMahon
Mark McMahon: 54.2% vs Frank Wickhorst: 22.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mark McMahon
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Frank Wickhorst
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mark McMahonFrank Wickhorst
EliteStrongAverageLean
1903Actual season year • SRS range -4.2 to -4.01946
Active comparison point
Mark McMahon • 1903
1903 Oklahoma
Best seasonWorst season5-4-3 • SRS -4.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
54.2%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Frank Wickhorst
Nearest year 1946 • California
2-7 • SRS -4.2 • SP Overall —
Mark McMahon holds a 0.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark McMahon | |||||
| Oklahoma | 1903-1903 | 1 | 5-4-3 | -4.0 | -4.0 |
| Frank Wickhorst | |||||
| California | 1946-1946 | 1 | 2-7 | -4.2 | -4.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Mark McMahon
5-4-3 • 54.2% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
37th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Oklahoma 1903
SRS -4.0
Worst Season
Oklahoma 1903
SRS -4.0
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Frank Wickhorst
2-7 • 22.2% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
California 1946
SRS -4.2
Worst Season
California 1946
SRS -4.2
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.