Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Joseph Wood
Joseph Wood: 75th pct vs Jim MacKenzie: 68th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jim MacKenzieJoseph Wood
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Jim MacKenzie vs Joseph Wood
Jim MacKenzie: 67th pct vs Joseph Wood: 66th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Jim MacKenzie vs Joseph Wood
Jim MacKenzie: 0 titles vs Joseph Wood: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Jim MacKenzie vs Joseph Wood
Jim MacKenzie: 1 seasons vs Joseph Wood: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Joseph Wood
Joseph Wood: 88.9% vs Jim MacKenzie: 60.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jim MacKenzie
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Joseph Wood
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jim MacKenzieJoseph Wood
EliteStrongAverageLean
1914Actual season year • SRS range 11.7 to 12.01966
Active comparison point
Jim MacKenzie • 1966
1966 Oklahoma
Best seasonWorst season6-4 • SRS 12.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
60.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Joseph Wood
Nearest year 1914 • Virginia
8-1 • SRS 11.7 • SP Overall —
Jim MacKenzie holds a 0.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim MacKenzie | |||||
| Oklahoma | 1966-1966 | 1 | 6-4 | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Joseph Wood | |||||
| Virginia | 1914-1914 | 1 | 8-1 | 11.7 | 11.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Jim MacKenzie
6-4 • 60.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Oklahoma 1966
SRS 12.0
Worst Season
Oklahoma 1966
SRS 12.0
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Higher career quality
Full profile →Joseph Wood
8-1 • 88.9% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
75th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Virginia 1914
SRS 11.7
Worst Season
Virginia 1914
SRS 11.7
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—