Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Snorter Luster
Snorter Luster: 60th pct vs Ed Walker: 57th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Snorter Luster
Snorter Luster: 60th pct vs Ed Walker: 57th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Snorter Luster
Snorter Luster: 66th pct vs Ed Walker: 59th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Ed Walker
Ed Walker: 90th pct vs Snorter Luster: 85th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Ed Walker vs Snorter Luster
Ed Walker: 0 titles vs Snorter Luster: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Ed Walker vs Snorter Luster
Ed Walker: 5 seasons vs Snorter Luster: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Snorter Luster
Snorter Luster: 59.4% vs Ed Walker: 56.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Snorter Luster
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Ed Walker
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
6-3 • SRS 11.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
66.7%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Ed Walker
Nearest year 1937 • Ole Miss
4-5-1 • SRS 0.8 • SP Overall —
Snorter Luster holds a 11.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snorter Luster | |||||
| Oklahoma | 1941-1945 | 5 | 27-18-3 | 4.4 | 11.9Highest peak |
| Ed Walker | |||||
| Ole Miss | 1933-1937 | 5 | 28-21-6 | 4.3 | 9.0 |
Closing takeaway
27-18-3 • 59.4% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
11.9 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Oklahoma 1941
SRS 11.9
Worst Season
Oklahoma 1942
SRS 1.2
Biggest Improvement
Oklahoma 1944
2.2 SRS
28-21-6 • 56.4% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
90th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Ole Miss 1936
SRS 9.0
Worst Season
Ole Miss 1934
SRS 0.2
Biggest Improvement
Ole Miss 1935
6.9 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.