Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Pete Cawthon
Pete Cawthon: 57th pct vs Adrian Lindsey: 42nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Pete Cawthon
Pete Cawthon: 57th pct vs Adrian Lindsey: 42nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Pete Cawthon
Pete Cawthon: 54th pct vs Adrian Lindsey: 47th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Adrian Lindsey vs Pete Cawthon
Adrian Lindsey: 85th pct vs Pete Cawthon: 84th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Adrian Lindsey vs Pete Cawthon
Adrian Lindsey: 0 titles vs Pete Cawthon: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Adrian Lindsey
Adrian Lindsey: 12 seasons vs Pete Cawthon: 9 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Pete Cawthon
Pete Cawthon: 72.9% vs Adrian Lindsey: 45.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Adrian Lindsey
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Pete Cawthon
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
5-4-1 • SRS 4.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
55.0%
YoY SRS
+5.4
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Pete Cawthon
Nearest year 1933 • Texas Tech
8-1 • SRS 6.9 • SP Overall —
Adrian Lindsey trails by a 2.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Lindsey | |||||
| Oklahoma | 1927-1931 | 5 | 19-19-6 | 0.9 | 4.3 |
| Kansas | 1933-1938 | 6 | 19-28-8 | -0.2 | 4.8 |
| Pete Cawthon | |||||
| Texas Tech | 1932-1940 | 9 | 67-23-6 | 0.6 | 6.9Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
38-47-14 • 45.5% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
12 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
Kansas 1933
SRS 4.8
Worst Season
Kansas 1936
SRS -8.7
Biggest Improvement
Kansas 1937
7.0 SRS
67-23-6 • 72.9% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
57th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Texas Tech 1933
SRS 6.9
Worst Season
Texas Tech 1939
SRS -7.4
Biggest Improvement
Texas Tech 1940
7.1 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.