Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches
Adrian LindseyPete Cawthon

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Clear edge

Edge: Pete Cawthon

Pete Cawthon: 57th pct vs Adrian Lindsey: 42nd pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Narrow edge

Edge: Pete Cawthon

Pete Cawthon: 54th pct vs Adrian Lindsey: 47th pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Similar

Similar: Adrian Lindsey vs Pete Cawthon

Adrian Lindsey: 85th pct vs Pete Cawthon: 84th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: Adrian Lindsey vs Pete Cawthon

Adrian Lindsey: 0 titles vs Pete Cawthon: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Clear edge

Edge: Adrian Lindsey

Adrian Lindsey: 12 seasons vs Pete Cawthon: 9 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Decisive edge

Edge: Pete Cawthon

Pete Cawthon: 72.9% vs Adrian Lindsey: 45.5%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Not enough data to compare.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Not enough data to compare.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Adrian Lindsey

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Pete Cawthon

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall:

Insufficient sample

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Adrian LindseyPete Cawthon
EliteStrongAverageLean
Adrian Lindsey: 1933 Kansas
1927Actual season year • SRS range -8.7 to 6.91940

Active comparison point

Adrian Lindsey1933

Selected

1933 Kansas

Best seasonNew stop: Kansas

5-4-1 • SRS 4.8 • SP Overall

Win %

55.0%

YoY SRS

+5.4

SP Off / Def

/

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

Pete Cawthon

Nearest year 1933Texas Tech

Profile

8-1 • SRS 6.9 • SP Overall

Adrian Lindsey trails by a 2.1-point SRS edge at this point.

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

SchoolYearsSeasonsRecordAvg SRSPeak
Adrian Lindsey
Oklahoma1927-1931519-19-60.94.3
Kansas1933-1938619-28-8-0.24.8
Pete Cawthon
Texas Tech1932-1940967-23-60.66.9Highest peak

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Longer run

Adrian Lindsey

38-47-1445.5%11 seasons • 0 titles

12 tracked seasons across the arc.

Full profile →

Best Season

Kansas 1933

SRS 4.8

Worst Season

Kansas 1936

SRS -8.7

Biggest Improvement

Kansas 1937

7.0 SRS

Higher career quality

Pete Cawthon

67-23-672.9%9 seasons • 0 titles

57th pct career-quality score.

Full profile →

Best Season

Texas Tech 1933

SRS 6.9

Worst Season

Texas Tech 1939

SRS -7.4

Biggest Improvement

Texas Tech 1940

7.1 SRS

Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.