Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: James Halligan
James Halligan: 55th pct vs Lewie Hardage: 49th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Lewie HardageJames Halligan
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Lewie Hardage
Lewie Hardage: 49th pct vs James Halligan: 44th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: James Halligan vs Lewie Hardage
James Halligan: 97th pct vs Lewie Hardage: 97th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: James Halligan vs Lewie Hardage
James Halligan: 0 titles vs Lewie Hardage: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: James Halligan vs Lewie Hardage
James Halligan: 3 seasons vs Lewie Hardage: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: James Halligan
James Halligan: 64.0% vs Lewie Hardage: 48.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Lewie Hardage
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
James Halligan
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Lewie HardageJames Halligan
EliteStrongAverageLean
1901Actual season year • SRS range 0.1 to 5.51934
Active comparison point
Lewie Hardage • 1933
1933 Oklahoma
Best seasonBiggest improvement4-4-1 • SRS 5.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+4.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
James Halligan
Nearest year 1903 • Massachusetts
5-4 • SRS 0.1 • SP Overall —
Lewie Hardage holds a 5.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lewie Hardage | |||||
| Oklahoma | 1932-1934 | 3 | 11-12-4 | 3.6Best quality | 5.5Highest peak |
| James Halligan | |||||
| Massachusetts | 1901-1903 | 3 | 15-8-2 | 2.5 | 4.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Lewie Hardage
11-12-4 • 48.1% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
5.5 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Oklahoma 1933
SRS 5.5
Worst Season
Oklahoma 1932
SRS 1.3
Biggest Improvement
Oklahoma 1933
4.2 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →James Halligan
15-8-2 • 64.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
55th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Massachusetts 1901
SRS 4.0
Worst Season
Massachusetts 1903
SRS 0.1
Biggest Improvement
Massachusetts 1902
-0.5 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.