Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Bill Hollenback vs Gary Gibbs
Bill Hollenback: 78th pct vs Gary Gibbs: 76th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Bill Hollenback vs Gary Gibbs
Bill Hollenback: 78th pct vs Gary Gibbs: 76th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Bill Hollenback vs Gary Gibbs
Bill Hollenback: 91st pct vs Gary Gibbs: 89th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Gary Gibbs vs Bill Hollenback
Gary Gibbs: 33rd pct vs Bill Hollenback: 31st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Bill Hollenback vs Gary Gibbs
Bill Hollenback: 0 titles vs Gary Gibbs: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Bill Hollenback vs Gary Gibbs
Bill Hollenback: 6 seasons vs Gary Gibbs: 6 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Bill Hollenback
Bill Hollenback: 71.4% vs Gary Gibbs: 65.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Gary Gibbs sets the reference point in overall strength.
Gary Gibbs sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Gary Gibbs
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 15.5
94th pct
Elite
Bill Hollenback
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
8-3 • SRS 22.4 • SP Overall 22.7
Win %
72.7%
YoY SRS
+11.7
SP Off / Def
41.7 / 21.1
Finish
#17
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Bill Hollenback
Nearest year 1914 • Penn State
5-3-1 • SRS 15.4 • SP Overall —
Gary Gibbs holds a 7.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary Gibbs | |||||
| Oklahoma | 1989-1994 | 6 | 44-23-2 | 13.7 | 22.4 |
| Bill Hollenback | |||||
| Penn State | 1909-1914 | 5 | 28-9-4 | 17.5Best quality | 23.9Highest peak |
| Missouri | 1910-1910 | 1 | 4-2-2 | -2.0 | -2.0 |
Closing takeaway
44-23-2 • 65.2% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
2.7 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Oklahoma 1990
SRS 22.4
Worst Season
Oklahoma 1994
SRS 2.7
Biggest Improvement
Oklahoma 1993
15.6 SRS
32-11-6 • 71.4% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Penn State 1912
SRS 23.9
Worst Season
Missouri 1910
SRS -2.0
Biggest Improvement
Penn State 1911
17.2 SRS