Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Everett Grandelius
Everett Grandelius: 79th pct vs Dave Smith: 61st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Everett Grandelius
Everett Grandelius: 79th pct vs Dave Smith: 61st pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Dave Smith
Dave Smith: 74th pct vs Everett Grandelius: 70th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Dave Smith vs Everett Grandelius
Dave Smith: 74th pct vs Everett Grandelius: 72nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dave Smith vs Everett Grandelius
Dave Smith: 0 titles vs Everett Grandelius: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dave Smith vs Everett Grandelius
Dave Smith: 4 seasons vs Everett Grandelius: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Everett Grandelius
Everett Grandelius: 64.5% vs Dave Smith: 52.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Dave Smith sets the reference point in overall strength.
Dave Smith sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Dave Smith
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 4.5
71th pct
Strong
Everett Grandelius
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
6-5 • SRS 15.3 • SP Overall 14.2
Win %
54.5%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
32.0 / 18.7
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Everett Grandelius
Nearest year 1961 • Colorado
9-2 • SRS 13.4 • SP Overall —
Dave Smith holds a 1.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dave Smith | |||||
| Oklahoma State | 1972-1972 | 1 | 6-5 | 15.3Best quality | 15.3Highest peak |
| SMU | 1973-1975 | 3 | 16-15-2 | 4.2 | 6.2 |
| Everett Grandelius | |||||
| Colorado | 1959-1961 | 3 | 20-11 | 7.1 | 13.4 |
Closing takeaway
22-20-2 • 52.3% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
15.3 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Oklahoma State 1972
SRS 15.3
Worst Season
SMU 1975
SRS 1.5
Biggest Improvement
SMU 1974
-1.4 SRS
20-11 • 64.5% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
79th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Colorado 1961
SRS 13.4
Worst Season
Colorado 1959
SRS 0.6
Biggest Improvement
Colorado 1960
6.8 SRS