Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Joe Peace
Joe Peace: 31st pct vs John Griffith: 26th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Joe Peace
Joe Peace: 31st pct vs John Griffith: 26th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Joe Peace
Joe Peace: 40th pct vs John Griffith: 32nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Joe Peace vs John Griffith
Joe Peace: 29th pct vs John Griffith: 28th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Joe Peace vs John Griffith
Joe Peace: 0 titles vs John Griffith: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Joe Peace vs John Griffith
Joe Peace: 8 seasons vs John Griffith: 8 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Joe Peace
Joe Peace: 47.7% vs John Griffith: 44.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Joe Peace sets the reference point in overall strength.
Joe Peace sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
John Griffith
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Joe Peace
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -8.6
31th pct
Lower end
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
2-4-1 • SRS -1.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
35.7%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Joe Peace
Nearest year 1988 • Louisiana Tech
4-7 • SRS -12.4 • SP Overall -14.1
John Griffith holds a 11.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Griffith | |||||
| Iowa | 1909-1909 | 1 | 2-4-1 | -1.4Best quality | -1.4 |
| Oklahoma State | 1915-1916 | 2 | 8-9-1 | -14.8 | -8.3 |
| Joe Peace | |||||
| Louisiana Tech | 1988-1995 | 8 | 40-44-4 | -9.1 | 2.1Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
10-13-2 • 44.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Iowa 1909
SRS -1.4
Worst Season
Oklahoma State 1916
SRS -21.3
Biggest Improvement
Oklahoma State 1915
-6.9 SRS
40-44-4 • 47.7% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
2.1 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Louisiana Tech 1990
SRS 2.1
Worst Season
Louisiana Tech 1994
SRS -21.0
Biggest Improvement
Louisiana Tech 1989
12.3 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.