Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: John Bender
John Bender: 46th pct vs Albert Exendine: 33rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Albert ExendineJohn Bender
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: John Bender
John Bender: 52nd pct vs Albert Exendine: 41st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Albert Exendine vs John Bender
Albert Exendine: 60th pct vs John Bender: 58th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Albert Exendine vs John Bender
Albert Exendine: 0 titles vs John Bender: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Albert Exendine vs John Bender
Albert Exendine: 13 seasons vs John Bender: 13 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: John Bender
John Bender: 64.1% vs Albert Exendine: 36.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Albert Exendine
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
John Bender
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Albert ExendineJohn Bender
EliteStrongAverageLean
Albert Exendine: 1934 Oklahoma StateJohn Bender: 1915 Kansas StateJohn Bender: 1916 Tennessee
1908Actual season year • SRS range -13.8 to 6.51935
Active comparison point
Albert Exendine • 1925
1925 Washington State
Best seasonBiggest improvement3-4-1 • SRS 2.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
43.8%
YoY SRS
+5.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
John Bender
Nearest year 1920 • Tennessee
7-2 • SRS -2.7 • SP Overall —
Albert Exendine holds a 5.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Exendine | |||||
| Washington State | 1923-1925 | 3 | 6-13-4 | 0.9Best quality | 2.9 |
| Oklahoma State | 1934-1935 | 2 | 7-12-1 | -9.7 | -5.6 |
| John Bender | |||||
| Haskell | 1908-1909 | 2 | 10-7-1 | -2.6 | 6.5Highest peak |
| Kansas State | 1915-1915 | 1 | 3-4-1 | -6.7 | -6.7 |
| Tennessee | 1916-1920 | 3 | 18-5-4 | -6.4 | -2.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Albert Exendine
13-25-5 • 36.0% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Washington State 1925
SRS 2.9
Worst Season
Oklahoma State 1935
SRS -13.8
Biggest Improvement
Washington State 1925
5.1 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →John Bender
31-16-6 • 64.1% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
46th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Haskell 1909
SRS 6.5
Worst Season
Haskell 1908
SRS -11.7
Biggest Improvement
Haskell 1909
18.2 SRS