Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Tom Lichtenberg vs Pete Cordelli
Tom Lichtenberg: 4th pct vs Pete Cordelli: 3rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Tom LichtenbergPete Cordelli
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Tom Lichtenberg vs Pete Cordelli
Tom Lichtenberg: 5th pct vs Pete Cordelli: 5th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Tom Lichtenberg
Tom Lichtenberg: 83rd pct vs Pete Cordelli: 73rd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Pete Cordelli vs Tom Lichtenberg
Pete Cordelli: 0 titles vs Tom Lichtenberg: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Tom Lichtenberg
Tom Lichtenberg: 5 seasons vs Pete Cordelli: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Tom Lichtenberg
Tom Lichtenberg: 16.4% vs Pete Cordelli: 9.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tom Lichtenberg and Pete Cordelli look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarTom Lichtenberg and Pete Cordelli look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tom Lichtenberg
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -20.4
7th pct
Lower end
Pete Cordelli
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -22.6
5th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Tom LichtenbergPete Cordelli
EliteStrongAverageLean
1990Actual season year • SRS range -32.3 to -19.71994
Active comparison point
Tom Lichtenberg • 1992
1992 Ohio
Best season1-10 • SRS -19.7 • SP Overall -17.7
Win %
9.1%
YoY SRS
+1.3
SP Off / Def
11.9 / 29.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Pete Cordelli
Nearest year 1992 • Kent State
2-9 • SRS -25.1 • SP Overall -22.8
Tom Lichtenberg holds a 5.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -0.7 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Lichtenberg | |||||
| Ohio | 1990-1994 | 5 | 8-45-2 | -25.1 | -19.7Longest stop |
| Pete Cordelli | |||||
| Kent State | 1991-1993 | 3 | 3-30 | -25.7 | -19.8 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Tom Lichtenberg
8-45-2 • 16.4% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
83rd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Ohio 1992
SRS -19.7
Worst Season
Ohio 1990
SRS -30.2
Biggest Improvement
Ohio 1991
9.2 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Pete Cordelli
3-30 • 9.1% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Kent State 1991
SRS -19.8
Worst Season
Kent State 1993
SRS -32.3
Biggest Improvement
Kent State 1992
-5.3 SRS