Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Larry Siemering
Larry Siemering: 62nd pct vs William Warner: 55th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Larry SiemeringWilliam Warner
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Larry Siemering
Larry Siemering: 71st pct vs William Warner: 67th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: William Warner
William Warner: 9th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Larry Siemering vs William Warner
Larry Siemering: 0 titles vs William Warner: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: William Warner vs Larry Siemering
William Warner: 3 seasons vs Larry Siemering: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Larry Siemering
Larry Siemering: 66.7% vs William Warner: 56.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Larry Siemering
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
William Warner
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Larry SiemeringWilliam Warner
EliteStrongAverageLean
Larry Siemering: 1951 Arizona StateWilliam Warner: 1906 Colgate
1905Actual season year • SRS range -12.5 to 14.01951
Active comparison point
Larry Siemering • 1950
1950 Pacific
Best season7-3-1 • SRS 14.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
68.2%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
William Warner
Nearest year 1907 • Colgate
4-4-1 • SRS 7.8 • SP Overall —
Larry Siemering holds a 6.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larry Siemering | |||||
| Pacific | 1950-1950 | 1 | 7-3-1 | 14.0Best quality | 14.0Highest peak |
| Arizona State | 1951-1951 | 1 | 6-3-1 | -8.0 | -8.0 |
| William Warner | |||||
| North Carolina | 1905-1905 | 1 | 4-3-1 | -12.5 | -12.5 |
| Colgate | 1906-1907 | 2 | 8-6-3 | 10.0 | 12.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Larry Siemering
13-6-2 • 66.7% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
62nd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Pacific 1950
SRS 14.0
Worst Season
Arizona State 1951
SRS -8.0
Biggest Improvement
Arizona State 1951
-22.0 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →William Warner
12-9-4 • 56.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
9th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Colgate 1906
SRS 12.2
Worst Season
North Carolina 1905
SRS -12.5
Biggest Improvement
Colgate 1906
24.7 SRS