Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Ted Shipkey
Ted Shipkey: 25th pct vs Doug Martin: 11th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Ted ShipkeyDoug Martin
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Ted Shipkey vs Doug Martin
Ted Shipkey: 19th pct vs Doug Martin: 17th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Doug Martin vs Ted Shipkey
Doug Martin: 71st pct vs Ted Shipkey: 69th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Doug Martin vs Ted Shipkey
Doug Martin: 0 titles vs Ted Shipkey: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Clear edgeEdge: Ted Shipkey
Ted Shipkey: 21 seasons vs Doug Martin: 18 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Ted Shipkey
Ted Shipkey: 57.5% vs Doug Martin: 29.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Doug Martin sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeDoug Martin sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Ted Shipkey
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Doug Martin
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -16.4
12th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Ted ShipkeyDoug Martin
EliteStrongAverageLean
Ted Shipkey: 1937 New MexicoTed Shipkey: 1949 MontanaDoug Martin: 2013 New Mexico State
1931Actual season year • SRS range -27.6 to -7.72021
Active comparison point
Ted Shipkey • 1938
1938 New Mexico
Best season8-3 • SRS -7.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
72.7%
YoY SRS
+4.7
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Doug Martin
Nearest year 2004 • Kent State
5-6 • SRS -8.9 • SP Overall -10.0
Ted Shipkey holds a 1.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ted Shipkey | |||||
| Arizona State | 1931-1932 | 2 | 10-5-1 | -21.0 | -20.4 |
| New Mexico | 1937-1941 | 5 | 30-17-2 | -12.4Best quality | -7.7Highest peak |
| Montana | 1949-1951 | 3 | 12-16 | -19.8 | -15.1 |
| Doug Martin | |||||
| Kent State | 2004-2010 | 7 | 29-53 | -14.3 | -8.9 |
| New Mexico State | 2013-2021 | 9 | 25-74 | -20.9 | -11.2Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Ted Shipkey
52-38-3 • 57.5% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
25th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
New Mexico 1938
SRS -7.7
Worst Season
Montana 1951
SRS -23.1
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico 1937
9.2 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Doug Martin
54-127 • 29.8% • 16 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Kent State 2004
SRS -8.9
Worst Season
New Mexico State 2013
SRS -27.6
Biggest Improvement
Kent State 2006
9.5 SRS