Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Jim MacKenzie vs William Hollenback
Jim MacKenzie: 68th pct vs William Hollenback: 66th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
William HollenbackJim MacKenzie
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: William Hollenback vs Jim MacKenzie
William Hollenback: 68th pct vs Jim MacKenzie: 67th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Jim MacKenzie vs William Hollenback
Jim MacKenzie: 0 titles vs William Hollenback: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Jim MacKenzie vs William Hollenback
Jim MacKenzie: 1 seasons vs William Hollenback: 1 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Jim MacKenzie
Jim MacKenzie: 60.0% vs William Hollenback: 55.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
William Hollenback
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Jim MacKenzie
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
William HollenbackJim MacKenzie
EliteStrongAverageLean
1916Actual season year • SRS range 12.0 to 12.81966
Active comparison point
William Hollenback • 1916
1916 Syracuse
Best seasonWorst season5-4 • SRS 12.8 • SP Overall —
Win %
55.6%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jim MacKenzie
Nearest year 1966 • Oklahoma
6-4 • SRS 12.0 • SP Overall —
William Hollenback holds a 0.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Hollenback | |||||
| Syracuse | 1916-1916 | 1 | 5-4 | 12.8 | 12.8 |
| Jim MacKenzie | |||||
| Oklahoma | 1966-1966 | 1 | 6-4 | 12.0 | 12.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →William Hollenback
5-4 • 55.6% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Syracuse 1916
SRS 12.8
Worst Season
Syracuse 1916
SRS 12.8
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Similar overall level
Full profile →Jim MacKenzie
6-4 • 60.0% • 1 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Oklahoma 1966
SRS 12.0
Worst Season
Oklahoma 1966
SRS 12.0
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
—
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.