Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Terry Hoeppner
Terry Hoeppner: 68th pct vs Dino Babers: 47th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Decisive edgeEdge: Terry Hoeppner
Terry Hoeppner: 68th pct vs Dino Babers: 47th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Terry Hoeppner
Terry Hoeppner: 82nd pct vs Dino Babers: 67th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Dino Babers
Dino Babers: 37th pct vs Terry Hoeppner: 32nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dino Babers vs Terry Hoeppner
Dino Babers: 0 titles vs Terry Hoeppner: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Dino Babers
Dino Babers: 10 seasons vs Terry Hoeppner: 8 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Terry Hoeppner
Terry Hoeppner: 59.4% vs Dino Babers: 48.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Dino Babers and Terry Hoeppner look similar in overall strength.
Dino Babers and Terry Hoeppner look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Dino Babers
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 0.7
60th pct
Above average
Terry Hoeppner
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 0.3
58th pct
Above average
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-3 • SRS 12.1 • SP Overall 7.5
Win %
76.9%
YoY SRS
+11.1
SP Off / Def
32.1 / 27.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Terry Hoeppner
Nearest year 2006 • Indiana
5-7 • SRS -6.1 • SP Overall -9.9
Dino Babers holds a 18.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +10.5 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dino Babers | |||||
| Bowling Green | 2014-2015 | 2 | 18-9 | -2.5 | 8.5 |
| Syracuse | 2016-2023 | 8 | 41-55 | 0.7 | 12.1Longest stop |
| Terry Hoeppner | |||||
| Miami (OH) | 1999-2004 | 6 | 48-25 | 0.5 | 18.6Highest peak |
| Indiana | 2005-2006 | 2 | 9-14 | -4.6 | -3.1 |
Closing takeaway
59-64 • 48.0% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
37th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Syracuse 2018
SRS 12.1
Worst Season
Bowling Green 2014
SRS -13.4
Biggest Improvement
Bowling Green 2015
21.9 SRS
57-39 • 59.4% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
68th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Miami (OH) 2003
SRS 18.6
Worst Season
Miami (OH) 2000
SRS -9.9
Biggest Improvement
Miami (OH) 2003
18.0 SRS