Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Dick Clausen vs Dan Martin
Dick Clausen: 12th pct vs Dan Martin: 11th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Dick ClausenDan Martin
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Dan Martin vs Dick Clausen
Dan Martin: 8th pct vs Dick Clausen: 7th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dan Martin vs Dick Clausen
Dan Martin: 0 titles vs Dick Clausen: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dan Martin vs Dick Clausen
Dan Martin: 3 seasons vs Dick Clausen: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: Dick Clausen
Dick Clausen: 40.0% vs Dan Martin: 37.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Dick Clausen
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Dan Martin
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Dick ClausenDan Martin
EliteStrongAverageLean
1904Actual season year • SRS range -23.4 to -16.11957
Active comparison point
Dick Clausen • 1957
1957 New Mexico
Best seasonBiggest improvementBiggest drop4-6 • SRS -16.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
40.0%
YoY SRS
+5.7
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Dan Martin
Nearest year 1906 • Mississippi State
2-2-1 • SRS -23.4 • SP Overall —
Dick Clausen holds a 6.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dick Clausen | |||||
| New Mexico | 1956-1957 | 2 | 8-12 | -19.6 | -16.7 |
| Dan Martin | |||||
| Mississippi State | 1904-1906 | 2 | 4-7-1 | -19.8 | -16.1 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Dick Clausen
8-12 • 40.0% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
New Mexico 1957
SRS -16.7
Worst Season
New Mexico 1956
SRS -22.4
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico 1957
5.7 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Dan Martin
4-7-1 • 37.5% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Mississippi State 1904
SRS -16.1
Worst Season
Mississippi State 1906
SRS -23.4
Biggest Improvement
Mississippi State 1906
-7.3 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.