Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Daddy Boles
Daddy Boles: 18th pct vs Gil Krueger: 14th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Gil KruegerDaddy Boles
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Gil Krueger vs Daddy Boles
Gil Krueger: 16th pct vs Daddy Boles: 14th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Gil Krueger
Gil Krueger: 86th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Daddy Boles vs Gil Krueger
Daddy Boles: 0 titles vs Gil Krueger: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Gil Krueger vs Daddy Boles
Gil Krueger: 5 seasons vs Daddy Boles: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Daddy Boles
Daddy Boles: 44.7% vs Gil Krueger: 31.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Gil Krueger sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeGil Krueger sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Gil Krueger
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -15.9
13th pct
Lower end
Daddy Boles
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Gil KruegerDaddy Boles
EliteStrongAverageLean
Daddy Boles: 1917 Kentucky
1914Actual season year • SRS range -19.2 to -9.51982
Active comparison point
Gil Krueger • 1978
1978 New Mexico State
Best season6-5 • SRS -9.5 • SP Overall -10.0
Win %
54.5%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
27.6 / 35.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Daddy Boles
Nearest year 1917 • Kentucky
3-5-1 • SRS -11.0 • SP Overall —
Gil Krueger holds a 1.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gil Krueger | |||||
| New Mexico State | 1978-1982 | 5 | 17-37-1 | -15.2 | -9.5Highest peak |
| Daddy Boles | |||||
| TCU | 1914-1914 | 1 | 4-4-2 | -19.2 | -19.2 |
| Kentucky | 1917-1917 | 1 | 3-5-1 | -11.0Best quality | -11.0 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Gil Krueger
17-37-1 • 31.8% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
86th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
New Mexico State 1978
SRS -9.5
Worst Season
New Mexico State 1979
SRS -19.2
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico State 1980
7.4 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Daddy Boles
7-9-3 • 44.7% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
18th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Kentucky 1917
SRS -11.0
Worst Season
TCU 1914
SRS -19.2
Biggest Improvement
Kentucky 1917
8.2 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.