Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Raymond Curfman
Raymond Curfman: 10th pct vs Mike Knoll: 2nd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Mike KnollRaymond Curfman
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Raymond Curfman vs Mike Knoll
Raymond Curfman: 2nd pct vs Mike Knoll: 2nd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Mike Knoll
Mike Knoll: 82nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Mike Knoll vs Raymond Curfman
Mike Knoll: 0 titles vs Raymond Curfman: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Narrow edgeEdge: Mike Knoll
Mike Knoll: 4 seasons vs Raymond Curfman: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Raymond Curfman
Raymond Curfman: 42.1% vs Mike Knoll: 9.1%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike Knoll sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeMike Knoll sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mike Knoll
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -32.4
1th pct
Lower end
Raymond Curfman
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mike KnollRaymond Curfman
EliteStrongAverageLean
1946Actual season year • SRS range -36.9 to -25.31989
Active comparison point
Mike Knoll • 1986
1986 New Mexico State
Best season1-10 • SRS -25.6 • SP Overall -25.5
Win %
9.1%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
23.5 / 43.2
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Raymond Curfman
Nearest year 1947 • New Mexico State
3-6 • SRS -31.7 • SP Overall —
Mike Knoll holds a 6.1-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Knoll | |||||
| New Mexico State | 1986-1989 | 4 | 4-40 | -30.1 | -25.6Longest stop |
| Raymond Curfman | |||||
| New Mexico State | 1946-1947 | 2 | 8-11 | -28.5Best quality | -25.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Longer run
Full profile →Mike Knoll
4-40 • 9.1% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
4 tracked seasons across the arc.
Best Season
New Mexico State 1986
SRS -25.6
Worst Season
New Mexico State 1987
SRS -36.9
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico State 1988
6.8 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Raymond Curfman
8-11 • 42.1% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
10th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
New Mexico State 1946
SRS -25.3
Worst Season
New Mexico State 1947
SRS -31.7
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico State 1947
-6.4 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.