Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Vaughn Corley vs Julius Johnston
Vaughn Corley: 5th pct vs Julius Johnston: 3rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Vaughn Corley vs Julius Johnston
Vaughn Corley: 5th pct vs Julius Johnston: 3rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Vaughn Corley vs Julius Johnston
Vaughn Corley: 2nd pct vs Julius Johnston: 1st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Julius Johnston
Julius Johnston: 63rd pct vs Vaughn Corley: 41st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Julius Johnston vs Vaughn Corley
Julius Johnston: 0 titles vs Vaughn Corley: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Julius Johnston vs Vaughn Corley
Julius Johnston: 3 seasons vs Vaughn Corley: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Vaughn Corley
Vaughn Corley: 31.0% vs Julius Johnston: 22.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Julius Johnston
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Vaughn Corley
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
3-6 • SRS -28.5 • SP Overall —
Win %
33.3%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Vaughn Corley
Nearest year 1948 • New Mexico State
3-7 • SRS -43.3 • SP Overall —
Julius Johnston holds a 14.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julius Johnston | |||||
| New Mexico State | 1940-1942 | 3 | 6-21 | -36.4 | -28.5 |
| Vaughn Corley | |||||
| New Mexico State | 1948-1950 | 3 | 9-20 | -34.4Best quality | -25.6Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
6-21 • 22.2% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
63rd pct steadiness score.
Best Season
New Mexico State 1940
SRS -28.5
Worst Season
New Mexico State 1942
SRS -42.6
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico State 1942
-4.5 SRS
9-20 • 31.0% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
New Mexico State 1950
SRS -25.6
Worst Season
New Mexico State 1948
SRS -43.3
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico State 1949
9.1 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.