Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Raymond Curfman
Raymond Curfman: 10th pct vs George Melinkovich: 4th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Raymond CurfmanGeorge Melinkovich
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Raymond Curfman vs George Melinkovich
Raymond Curfman: 2nd pct vs George Melinkovich: 1st pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: George Melinkovich vs Raymond Curfman
George Melinkovich: 0 titles vs Raymond Curfman: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: George Melinkovich vs Raymond Curfman
George Melinkovich: 2 seasons vs Raymond Curfman: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Raymond Curfman
Raymond Curfman: 42.1% vs George Melinkovich: 23.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Raymond Curfman
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
George Melinkovich
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Raymond CurfmanGeorge Melinkovich
EliteStrongAverageLean
1946Actual season year • SRS range -31.7 to -25.31950
Active comparison point
Raymond Curfman • 1946
1946 New Mexico State
Best season5-5 • SRS -25.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
George Melinkovich
Nearest year 1949 • Utah State
3-7 • SRS -27.3 • SP Overall —
Raymond Curfman holds a 2.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond Curfman | |||||
| New Mexico State | 1946-1947 | 2 | 8-11 | -28.5 | -25.3Highest peak |
| George Melinkovich | |||||
| Utah State | 1949-1950 | 2 | 5-16 | -29.3 | -27.3 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Raymond Curfman
8-11 • 42.1% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
10th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
New Mexico State 1946
SRS -25.3
Worst Season
New Mexico State 1947
SRS -31.7
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico State 1947
-6.4 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →George Melinkovich
5-16 • 23.8% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Utah State 1949
SRS -27.3
Worst Season
Utah State 1950
SRS -31.3
Biggest Improvement
Utah State 1950
-4.0 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.