Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: John Stiegman
John Stiegman: 16th pct vs George McLaren: 13th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
John StiegmanGeorge McLaren
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Decisive edgeEdge: John Stiegman
John Stiegman: 32nd pct vs George McLaren: 14th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: George McLaren
George McLaren: 13th pct vs John Stiegman: 7th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: George McLaren vs John Stiegman
George McLaren: 0 titles vs John Stiegman: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: George McLaren vs John Stiegman
George McLaren: 10 seasons vs John Stiegman: 9 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: John Stiegman
John Stiegman: 41.5% vs George McLaren: 39.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
John Stiegman
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
George McLaren
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
John StiegmanGeorge McLaren
EliteStrongAverageLean
John Stiegman: 1960 PennsylvaniaGeorge McLaren: 1927 Wyoming
1920Actual season year • SRS range -37.5 to -1.71964
Active comparison point
John Stiegman • 1958
1958 Rutgers
Best season8-1 • SRS -1.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
88.9%
YoY SRS
+7.4
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#20
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
George McLaren
Nearest year 1929 • Wyoming
1-7 • SRS -35.9 • SP Overall —
John Stiegman holds a 34.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Stiegman | |||||
| Rutgers | 1956-1959 | 4 | 22-15 | -16.2 | -1.7Highest peak |
| Pennsylvania | 1960-1964 | 5 | 12-33 | -30.1 | -22.2 |
| George McLaren | |||||
| Arkansas | 1920-1921 | 2 | 8-5-3 | -11.4Best quality | -11.1 |
| Wyoming | 1927-1929 | 3 | 7-19 | -27.1 | -16.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →John Stiegman
34-48 • 41.5% • 9 seasons • 0 titles
-1.7 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Rutgers 1958
SRS -1.7
Worst Season
Pennsylvania 1961
SRS -37.5
Biggest Improvement
Rutgers 1957
21.5 SRS
Steadier arc
Full profile →George McLaren
15-24-3 • 39.3% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
13th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Arkansas 1921
SRS -11.1
Worst Season
Wyoming 1929
SRS -35.9
Biggest Improvement
Arkansas 1921
0.6 SRS