Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Doug Graber
Doug Graber: 34th pct vs Mark Duffner: 30th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Doug GraberMark Duffner
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Doug Graber
Doug Graber: 40th pct vs Mark Duffner: 36th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Mark Duffner vs Doug Graber
Mark Duffner: 77th pct vs Doug Graber: 75th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Doug Graber vs Mark Duffner
Doug Graber: 0 titles vs Mark Duffner: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Doug Graber vs Mark Duffner
Doug Graber: 6 seasons vs Mark Duffner: 5 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Doug Graber
Doug Graber: 44.7% vs Mark Duffner: 36.4%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mark Duffner and Doug Graber look similar in overall strength.
Overall Strength
SimilarMark Duffner and Doug Graber look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Doug Graber
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -7.1
35th pct
Lower end
Mark Duffner
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -6.0
39th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Doug GraberMark Duffner
EliteStrongAverageLean
1990Actual season year • SRS range -13.8 to 2.31996
Active comparison point
Doug Graber • 1992
1992 Rutgers
Best season7-4 • SRS 2.3 • SP Overall -1.4
Win %
63.6%
YoY SRS
+5.9
SP Off / Def
32.7 / 34.2
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Mark Duffner
Nearest year 1992 • Maryland
3-8 • SRS 0.6 • SP Overall 0.4
Doug Graber holds a 1.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: -4.0 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doug Graber | |||||
| Rutgers | 1990-1995 | 6 | 29-36-1 | -5.3 | 2.3Highest peak |
| Mark Duffner | |||||
| Maryland | 1992-1996 | 5 | 20-35 | -4.9 | 0.6 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher career quality
Full profile →Doug Graber
29-36-1 • 44.7% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
34th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Rutgers 1992
SRS 2.3
Worst Season
Rutgers 1990
SRS -13.8
Biggest Improvement
Rutgers 1991
10.2 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Mark Duffner
20-35 • 36.4% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Maryland 1992
SRS 0.6
Worst Season
Maryland 1993
SRS -12.7
Biggest Improvement
Maryland 1994
7.6 SRS