Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: William Glassford
William Glassford: 44th pct vs Clyde Smith: 40th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
William GlassfordClyde Smith
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: William Glassford
William Glassford: 54th pct vs Clyde Smith: 50th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: William Glassford
William Glassford: 69th pct vs Clyde Smith: 62nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Clyde Smith vs William Glassford
Clyde Smith: 0 titles vs William Glassford: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Clyde Smith vs William Glassford
Clyde Smith: 7 seasons vs William Glassford: 7 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: William Glassford
William Glassford: 46.4% vs Clyde Smith: 36.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
William Glassford
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Clyde Smith
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
William GlassfordClyde Smith
EliteStrongAverageLean
Clyde Smith: 1952 Arizona State
1948Actual season year • SRS range -12.3 to 6.91955
Active comparison point
William Glassford • 1950
1950 Nebraska
Best season6-2-1 • SRS 6.9 • SP Overall —
Win %
72.2%
YoY SRS
+7.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
#17
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Clyde Smith
Nearest year 1950 • Indiana
3-5-1 • SRS 3.4 • SP Overall —
William Glassford holds a 3.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Glassford | |||||
| Nebraska | 1949-1955 | 7 | 30-35-4 | 0.3 | 6.9Highest peak |
| Clyde Smith | |||||
| Indiana | 1948-1951 | 4 | 8-27-1 | 3.3Best quality | 5.7 |
| Arizona State | 1952-1954 | 3 | 15-13-1 | -3.5 | 5.4 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →William Glassford
30-35-4 • 46.4% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
69th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Nebraska 1950
SRS 6.9
Worst Season
Nebraska 1951
SRS -10.9
Biggest Improvement
Nebraska 1952
16.6 SRS
Broader school footprint
Full profile →Clyde Smith
23-40-2 • 36.9% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
Indiana 1951
SRS 5.7
Worst Season
Arizona State 1954
SRS -12.3
Biggest Improvement
Indiana 1949
2.8 SRS