Coaches Compare

Compare coach careers on the same scale.

See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.

Browse all coaches

Choose two to four coaches

Scott FrostDeWitt Weaver

2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.

Top-line verdicts

Who leads, and by how much

Career Quality

Clear edge

Edge: Scott Frost

Scott Frost: 69th pct vs DeWitt Weaver: 56th pct

Percentile score against all tracked coaches.

Peak Score

Narrow edge

Edge: Scott Frost

Scott Frost: 86th pct vs DeWitt Weaver: 81st pct

Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.

Consistency

Clear edge

Edge: Scott Frost

Scott Frost: 45th pct vs DeWitt Weaver: 35th pct

Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.

National Championships

Similar

Similar: DeWitt Weaver vs Scott Frost

DeWitt Weaver: 0 titles vs Scott Frost: 0 titles

Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.

Longevity

Similar

Similar: DeWitt Weaver vs Scott Frost

DeWitt Weaver: 10 seasons vs Scott Frost: 10 seasons

Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.

Career Win Percentage

Similar

Similar: DeWitt Weaver vs Scott Frost

DeWitt Weaver: 49.0% vs Scott Frost: 47.9%

Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Scott Frost sets the reference point in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Scott Frost sets the reference point in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Scott Frost

Strong

Raw avg SP Overall: 4.4

71th pct

Strong

DeWitt Weaver

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall: —

—

Insufficient sample

Career Arc Overlay

Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Scott FrostDeWitt Weaver

EliteStrongAverageLean

Higher peak

Scott Frost reached the best single-season peak.

Sharper early climb

DeWitt Weaver climbed faster out of the gate.

Scott Frost: 2018 NebraskaScott Frost: 2025 UCF

1951Actual season year • SRS range -7.0 to 20.72025

Active comparison point

Scott Frost • 2017

Selected

2017 UCF

Best seasonBiggest improvement

13-0 • SRS 20.7 • SP Overall 14.1

Win %

100.0%

YoY SRS

+21.9

SP Off / Def

40.5 / 26.9

Finish

Open coach profile →

Comparison context

Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.

DeWitt Weaver

Nearest year 1960 • Texas Tech

Profile

3-6-1 • SRS 5.3 • SP Overall —

Scott Frost holds a 15.4-point SRS edge at this point.

Tenure comparison

Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.

School	Years	Seasons	Record	Avg SRS	Peak
Scott Frost
UCF	2016-2025	3	19-7	6.2Best quality	20.7Highest peak
Nebraska	2018-2022	5	16-31	2.3	7.3
DeWitt Weaver
Texas Tech	1951-1960	10	49-51-5	3.4	18.5Longest stop

Closing takeaway

What separates these careers at the finish

Higher career quality

Scott Frost

35-38 • 47.9% • 8 seasons • 0 titles

69th pct career-quality score.

Full profile →

Best Season

UCF 2017

SRS 20.7

Worst Season

Nebraska 2022

SRS -1.8

Biggest Improvement

UCF 2017

21.9 SRS

Similar overall level

DeWitt Weaver

49-51-5 • 49.0% • 10 seasons • 0 titles

This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.

Full profile →

Best Season

Texas Tech 1953

SRS 18.5

Worst Season

Texas Tech 1957

SRS -7.0

Biggest Improvement

Texas Tech 1953

24.5 SRS