Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Fred Folsom
Fred Folsom: 65th pct vs Fred Dawson: 53rd pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Fred DawsonFred Folsom
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Fred Dawson
Fred Dawson: 97th pct vs Fred Folsom: 90th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: Fred Folsom vs Fred Dawson
Fred Folsom: 1st pct vs Fred Dawson: 0th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Fred Dawson vs Fred Folsom
Fred Dawson: 0 titles vs Fred Folsom: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Fred Folsom vs Fred Dawson
Fred Folsom: 14 seasons vs Fred Dawson: 13 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Fred Folsom
Fred Folsom: 78.1% vs Fred Dawson: 52.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Fred Dawson
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Fred Folsom
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Fred DawsonFred Folsom
EliteStrongAverageLean
Fred Dawson: 1925 DenverFred Dawson: 1931 VirginiaFred Folsom: 1903 DartmouthFred Folsom: 1908 Colorado
1902Actual season year • SRS range -46.2 to 31.01933
Active comparison point
Fred Dawson • 1921
1921 Nebraska
Best season7-1 • SRS 31.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
87.5%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Fred Folsom
Nearest year 1915 • Colorado
1-6 • SRS -46.2 • SP Overall —
Fred Dawson holds a 77.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Dawson | |||||
| Nebraska | 1921-1924 | 4 | 23-7-2 | 21.5Best quality | 31.0Highest peak |
| Denver | 1925-1928 | 4 | 14-16-1 | -20.1 | -6.8 |
| Virginia | 1931-1933 | 3 | 8-17-4 | -10.2 | -8.9 |
| Fred Folsom | |||||
| Colorado | 1902-1915 | 9 | 45-14-1 | -5.7 | 8.8Longest stop |
| Dartmouth | 1903-1906 | 4 | 29-5-4 | 13.8 | 22.9 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Better floor
Full profile →Fred Dawson
45-40-7 • 52.7% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
-36.9 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Nebraska 1921
SRS 31.0
Worst Season
Denver 1925
SRS -36.9
Biggest Improvement
Denver 1926
15.1 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Fred Folsom
74-19-5 • 78.1% • 13 seasons • 0 titles
65th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Dartmouth 1904
SRS 22.9
Worst Season
Colorado 1915
SRS -46.2
Biggest Improvement
Dartmouth 1903
20.8 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.