Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Ernest Bearg vs Harry Kipke
Ernest Bearg: 70th pct vs Harry Kipke: 69th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Ernest Bearg vs Harry Kipke
Ernest Bearg: 70th pct vs Harry Kipke: 69th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Harry Kipke
Harry Kipke: 90th pct vs Ernest Bearg: 79th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Ernest Bearg
Ernest Bearg: 19th pct vs Harry Kipke: 14th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Ernest Bearg vs Harry Kipke
Ernest Bearg: 0 titles vs Harry Kipke: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Ernest Bearg vs Harry Kipke
Ernest Bearg: 11 seasons vs Harry Kipke: 10 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Ernest Bearg
Ernest Bearg: 66.3% vs Harry Kipke: 61.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Ernest Bearg
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Harry Kipke
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
4-2-2 • SRS 17.4 • SP Overall —
Win %
62.5%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Harry Kipke
Nearest year 1928 • Michigan State
3-4-1 • SRS -2.9 • SP Overall —
Ernest Bearg holds a 20.3-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ernest Bearg | |||||
| Nebraska | 1925-1928 | 4 | 23-7-3 | 12.4Best quality | 17.4 |
| Washburn | 1935-1935 | 1 | 4-6 | -9.1 | -9.1 |
| Harry Kipke | |||||
| Michigan State | 1928-1928 | 1 | 3-4-1 | -2.9 | -2.9 |
| Michigan | 1929-1937 | 9 | 46-26-4 | 8.0 | 23.5Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
27-13-3 • 66.3% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
19th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Nebraska 1925
SRS 17.4
Worst Season
Washburn 1935
SRS -9.1
Biggest Improvement
Nebraska 1927
0.9 SRS
49-30-5 • 61.3% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
23.5 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Michigan 1933
SRS 23.5
Worst Season
Michigan 1934
SRS -6.0
Biggest Improvement
Michigan 1929
10.9 SRS