Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Frank Thompson vs Fred Vonappen
Frank Thompson: 7th pct vs Fred Vonappen: 6th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Frank Thompson vs Fred Vonappen
Frank Thompson: 7th pct vs Fred Vonappen: 6th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Fred Vonappen
Fred Vonappen: 12th pct vs Frank Thompson: 8th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: Frank Thompson
Frank Thompson: 67th pct vs Fred Vonappen: 56th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Frank Thompson vs Fred Vonappen
Frank Thompson: 0 titles vs Fred Vonappen: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Frank Thompson vs Fred Vonappen
Frank Thompson: 3 seasons vs Fred Vonappen: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Frank Thompson
Frank Thompson: 20.8% vs Fred Vonappen: 13.9%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Fred Vonappen sets the reference point in overall strength.
Fred Vonappen sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Frank Thompson
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Fred Vonappen
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -22.8
5th pct
Lower end
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
3-5 • SRS -15.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
37.5%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Fred Vonappen
Nearest year 1996 • Hawai'i
2-10 • SRS -22.1 • SP Overall -24.0
Frank Thompson holds a 6.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank Thompson | |||||
| Wake Forest | 1911-1913 | 3 | 5-19 | -20.0 | -15.2 |
| Fred Vonappen | |||||
| Hawai'i | 1996-1998 | 3 | 5-31 | -20.4 | -12.1Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
5-19 • 20.8% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
67th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Wake Forest 1911
SRS -15.2
Worst Season
Wake Forest 1912
SRS -27.8
Biggest Improvement
Wake Forest 1913
10.8 SRS
5-31 • 13.9% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Hawai'i 1997
SRS -12.1
Worst Season
Hawai'i 1998
SRS -27.1
Biggest Improvement
Hawai'i 1997
10.0 SRS