Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Billy Hildebrand vs Paul Wulff
Billy Hildebrand: 17th pct vs Paul Wulff: 16th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Billy HildebrandPaul Wulff
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Billy Hildebrand
Billy Hildebrand: 34th pct vs Paul Wulff: 28th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Billy Hildebrand
Billy Hildebrand: 30th pct vs Paul Wulff: 24th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Billy Hildebrand vs Paul Wulff
Billy Hildebrand: 0 titles vs Paul Wulff: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Billy Hildebrand vs Paul Wulff
Billy Hildebrand: 4 seasons vs Paul Wulff: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Paul Wulff vs Billy Hildebrand
Paul Wulff: 18.4% vs Billy Hildebrand: 17.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Paul Wulff sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgePaul Wulff sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Billy Hildebrand
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Paul Wulff
Lower end
Raw avg SP Overall: -12.2
22th pct
Lower end
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Billy HildebrandPaul Wulff
EliteStrongAverageLean
1960Actual season year • SRS range -22.7 to -0.22011
Active comparison point
Billy Hildebrand • 1961
1961 Wake Forest
Best seasonBiggest improvement4-6 • SRS -0.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
40.0%
YoY SRS
+10.3
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Paul Wulff
Nearest year 2008 • Washington State
2-11 • SRS -20.8 • SP Overall -17.5
Billy Hildebrand holds a 20.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billy Hildebrand | |||||
| Wake Forest | 1960-1963 | 4 | 7-33 | -11.9 | -0.2Highest peak |
| Paul Wulff | |||||
| Washington State | 2008-2011 | 4 | 9-40 | -12.2 | -3.1 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Billy Hildebrand
7-33 • 17.5% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
-0.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Wake Forest 1961
SRS -0.2
Worst Season
Wake Forest 1963
SRS -22.7
Biggest Improvement
Wake Forest 1961
10.3 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Paul Wulff
9-40 • 18.4% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Washington State 2010
SRS -3.1
Worst Season
Washington State 2009
SRS -21.0
Biggest Improvement
Washington State 2010
17.9 SRS