Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: NP Stauffer
NP Stauffer: 54th pct vs Dave Clawson: 47th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Dave ClawsonNP Stauffer
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Dave Clawson vs NP Stauffer
Dave Clawson: 71st pct vs NP Stauffer: 69th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Clear edgeEdge: NP Stauffer
NP Stauffer: 34th pct vs Dave Clawson: 25th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dave Clawson vs NP Stauffer
Dave Clawson: 0 titles vs NP Stauffer: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dave Clawson vs NP Stauffer
Dave Clawson: 16 seasons vs NP Stauffer: 16 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: NP Stauffer
NP Stauffer: 63.6% vs Dave Clawson: 49.5%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Dave Clawson sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeDave Clawson sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Dave Clawson
Mixed
Raw avg SP Overall: -1.0
53th pct
Mixed
NP Stauffer
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Dave ClawsonNP Stauffer
EliteStrongAverageLean
Dave Clawson: 2014 Wake ForestNP Stauffer: 1909 Ole Miss
1896Actual season year • SRS range -20.2 to 13.82024
Active comparison point
Dave Clawson • 2017
2017 Wake Forest
Best seasonBiggest improvement8-5 • SRS 13.8 • SP Overall 10.5
Win %
61.5%
YoY SRS
+13.6
SP Off / Def
35.7 / 25.1
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
NP Stauffer
Nearest year 1911 • Ole Miss
6-3 • SRS 1.9 • SP Overall —
Dave Clawson holds a 11.9-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dave Clawson | |||||
| Bowling Green | 2009-2013 | 5 | 32-32 | -7.0 | 5.3 |
| Wake Forest | 2014-2024 | 11 | 67-69 | 1.1 | 13.8Longest stop |
| NP Stauffer | |||||
| Dickinson (PA) | 1896-1899 | 4 | 25-16-3 | -7.4 | -3.0 |
| Ole Miss | 1909-1911 | 3 | 17-7-2 | 4.1Best quality | 13.2 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Dave Clawson
99-101 • 49.5% • 16 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Wake Forest 2017
SRS 13.8
Worst Season
Bowling Green 2010
SRS -20.2
Biggest Improvement
Wake Forest 2017
13.6 SRS
Better floor
Full profile →NP Stauffer
42-23-5 • 63.6% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
-9.9 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Ole Miss 1910
SRS 13.2
Worst Season
Dickinson (PA) 1898
SRS -9.9
Biggest Improvement
Ole Miss 1910
16.1 SRS