Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: William Tate vs Paul Amen
William Tate: 37th pct vs Paul Amen: 35th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Paul AmenWilliam Tate
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: William Tate
William Tate: 49th pct vs Paul Amen: 45th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
SimilarSimilar: William Tate vs Paul Amen
William Tate: 84th pct vs Paul Amen: 82nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Paul Amen vs William Tate
Paul Amen: 0 titles vs William Tate: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: William Tate vs Paul Amen
William Tate: 5 seasons vs Paul Amen: 4 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: William Tate
William Tate: 35.0% vs Paul Amen: 31.3%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Paul Amen
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
William Tate
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Paul AmenWilliam Tate
EliteStrongAverageLean
1956Actual season year • SRS range -7.7 to 5.61968
Active comparison point
Paul Amen • 1959
1959 Wake Forest
Best season6-4 • SRS 4.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
60.0%
YoY SRS
+4.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
William Tate
Nearest year 1964 • Wake Forest
5-5 • SRS 0.7 • SP Overall —
Paul Amen holds a 3.5-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Amen | |||||
| Wake Forest | 1956-1959 | 4 | 11-26-3 | -1.1 | 4.2 |
| William Tate | |||||
| Wake Forest | 1964-1968 | 5 | 17-32-1 | -1.0 | 5.6Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Paul Amen
11-26-3 • 31.3% • 4 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Wake Forest 1959
SRS 4.2
Worst Season
Wake Forest 1957
SRS -7.7
Biggest Improvement
Wake Forest 1958
7.7 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →William Tate
17-32-1 • 35.0% • 5 seasons • 0 titles
5.6 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Wake Forest 1968
SRS 5.6
Worst Season
Wake Forest 1965
SRS -6.8
Biggest Improvement
Wake Forest 1968
7.7 SRS