Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: Larry Fedora
Larry Fedora: 60th pct vs Paul Hackett: 50th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Larry FedoraPaul Hackett
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Larry Fedora
Larry Fedora: 83rd pct vs Paul Hackett: 70th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Larry Fedora
Larry Fedora: 45th pct vs Paul Hackett: 41st pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Larry Fedora vs Paul Hackett
Larry Fedora: 0 titles vs Paul Hackett: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Larry Fedora vs Paul Hackett
Larry Fedora: 11 seasons vs Paul Hackett: 11 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Larry Fedora
Larry Fedora: 56.0% vs Paul Hackett: 45.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Larry Fedora has the clear edge in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Clear edgeLarry Fedora has the clear edge in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Larry Fedora
Strong
Raw avg SP Overall: 8.1
81th pct
Strong
Paul Hackett
Above average
Raw avg SP Overall: 3.9
70th pct
Above average
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Larry FedoraPaul Hackett
EliteStrongAverageLean
Larry Fedora: 2012 North CarolinaPaul Hackett: 1998 USC
1990Actual season year • SRS range -10.7 to 19.22018
Active comparison point
Larry Fedora • 2015
2015 North Carolina
Best seasonBiggest improvement11-3 • SRS 19.2 • SP Overall 20.0
Win %
78.6%
YoY SRS
+21.5
SP Off / Def
43.3 / 25.3
Finish
#15
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Paul Hackett
Nearest year 2000 • USC
5-7 • SRS 4.2 • SP Overall 4.6
Larry Fedora holds a 15.0-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +8.7 SP offense
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larry Fedora | |||||
| Southern Miss | 2008-2011 | 4 | 34-19 | 1.9 | 8.6 |
| North Carolina | 2012-2018 | 7 | 45-43 | 4.0 | 19.2Highest peak |
| Paul Hackett | |||||
| Pittsburgh | 1990-1992 | 3 | 12-20-1 | -3.0 | 2.4 |
| USC | 1998-2000 | 3 | 19-18 | 7.6Best quality | 13.6 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Larry Fedora
79-62 • 56.0% • 11 seasons • 0 titles
19.2 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
North Carolina 2015
SRS 19.2
Worst Season
North Carolina 2018
SRS -6.5
Biggest Improvement
North Carolina 2015
21.5 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Paul Hackett
31-38-1 • 45.0% • 6 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
USC 1998
SRS 13.6
Worst Season
Pittsburgh 1992
SRS -10.7
Biggest Improvement
USC 1998
24.3 SRS