Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Paul Davis
Paul Davis: 56th pct vs George Barclay: 49th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
George BarclayPaul Davis
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Clear edgeEdge: Paul Davis
Paul Davis: 75th pct vs George Barclay: 59th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: George Barclay
George Barclay: 76th pct vs Paul Davis: 57th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: George Barclay vs Paul Davis
George Barclay: 0 titles vs Paul Davis: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
Decisive edgeEdge: Paul Davis
Paul Davis: 59 seasons vs George Barclay: 48 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: George Barclay
George Barclay: 51.4% vs Paul Davis: 47.8%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
George Barclay
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Paul Davis
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
George BarclayPaul Davis
EliteStrongAverageLean
George Barclay: 1949 Washington and LeeGeorge Barclay: 1953 North CarolinaPaul Davis: 1914 Oklahoma StatePaul Davis: 1962 Mississippi State
1908Actual season year • SRS range -5.0 to 15.41966
Active comparison point
George Barclay • 1951
1951 Washington and Lee
Best season6-4 • SRS 9.2 • SP Overall —
Win %
60.0%
YoY SRS
+5.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Paul Davis
Nearest year 1962 • Mississippi State
3-6 • SRS 7.6 • SP Overall —
George Barclay holds a 1.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Barclay | |||||
| Lafayette | 1908-1908 | 1 | 6-2-2 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Washington and Lee | 1949-1951 | 3 | 17-12-1 | 2.8 | 9.2 |
| North Carolina | 1953-1955 | 3 | 11-18-1 | -2.3 | -1.6 |
| Paul Davis | |||||
| Dickinson (PA) | 1908-1908 | 1 | 5-4 | -0.2 | -0.2 |
| Oklahoma State | 1914-1914 | 1 | 6-2-1 | -4.7 | -4.7 |
| Mississippi State | 1962-1966 | 5 | 20-28-2 | 8.3Best quality | 15.4Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →George Barclay
34-32-4 • 51.4% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
76th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
Washington and Lee 1951
SRS 9.2
Worst Season
Washington and Lee 1949
SRS -5.0
Biggest Improvement
Washington and Lee 1950
9.1 SRS
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Paul Davis
31-34-3 • 47.8% • 7 seasons • 0 titles
15.4 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Mississippi State 1963
SRS 15.4
Worst Season
Oklahoma State 1914
SRS -4.7
Biggest Improvement
Mississippi State 1962
12.3 SRS