Career Quality
Clear edgeEdge: HI Dean
HI Dean: 14th pct vs John Van Liew: 4th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
John Van LiewHI Dean
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: HI Dean vs John Van Liew
HI Dean: 8th pct vs John Van Liew: 6th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: HI Dean
HI Dean: 9th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: HI Dean vs John Van Liew
HI Dean: 0 titles vs John Van Liew: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: John Van Liew vs HI Dean
John Van Liew: 4 seasons vs HI Dean: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: HI Dean
HI Dean: 47.9% vs John Van Liew: 17.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
John Van Liew
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
HI Dean
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
John Van LiewHI Dean
EliteStrongAverageLean
John Van Liew: 1930 NC State
1909Actual season year • SRS range -41.4 to -15.81930
Active comparison point
John Van Liew • 1930
1930 NC State
Best seasonBiggest improvementBiggest dropNew stop: NC State2-8 • SRS -17.6 • SP Overall —
Win %
20.0%
YoY SRS
+23.5
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
HI Dean
Nearest year 1911 • Wyoming
4-3-1 • SRS -15.8 • SP Overall —
John Van Liew trails by a 1.8-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Van Liew | |||||
| Western Colorado | 1927-1927 | 1 | 1-6 | -41.1 | -41.1 |
| NC State | 1930-1930 | 1 | 2-8 | -17.6Best quality | -17.6 |
| HI Dean | |||||
| Wyoming | 1909-1911 | 3 | 11-12-1 | -26.8 | -15.8Highest peak |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Broader school footprint
Full profile →John Van Liew
3-14 • 17.6% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
2 schools across the tracked career.
Best Season
NC State 1930
SRS -17.6
Worst Season
Western Colorado 1927
SRS -41.1
Biggest Improvement
NC State 1930
23.5 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →HI Dean
11-12-1 • 47.9% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
14th pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Wyoming 1911
SRS -15.8
Worst Season
Wyoming 1909
SRS -41.4
Biggest Improvement
Wyoming 1910
18.2 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.