Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: John Cooper vs Carl Snavely
John Cooper: 90th pct vs Carl Snavely: 90th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: John Cooper vs Carl Snavely
John Cooper: 90th pct vs Carl Snavely: 90th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: John Cooper vs Carl Snavely
John Cooper: 96th pct vs Carl Snavely: 93rd pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Carl Snavely
Carl Snavely: 15th pct vs John Cooper: 9th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Carl Snavely vs John Cooper
Carl Snavely: 0 titles vs John Cooper: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: John Cooper vs Carl Snavely
John Cooper: 24 seasons vs Carl Snavely: 23 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Narrow edgeEdge: John Cooper
John Cooper: 69.2% vs Carl Snavely: 67.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
John Cooper sets the reference point in overall strength.
John Cooper sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
John Cooper
Elite
Raw avg SP Overall: 13.0
91th pct
Elite
Carl Snavely
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
11-2 • SRS 28.2 • SP Overall 28.4
Win %
84.6%
YoY SRS
+11.7
SP Off / Def
44.8 / 18.7
Finish
#6
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Carl Snavely
Nearest year 1952 • North Carolina
2-6 • SRS -0.4 • SP Overall —
John Cooper holds a 28.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Cooper | |||||
| Tulsa | 1977-1984 | 8 | 56-32 | -0.5 | 7.6 |
| Arizona State | 1985-1987 | 3 | 25-9-2 | 13.6 | 20.9 |
| Ohio State | 1988-2000 | 13 | 111-43-4 | 15.4 | 28.2Highest peak |
| Carl Snavely | |||||
| Bucknell | 1930-1933 | 4 | 23-9-4 | 2.1 | 15.2 |
| North Carolina | 1934-1952 | 10 | 59-35-5 | 10.7 | 25.8 |
| Cornell | 1937-1940 | 4 | 24-5-2 | 17.6Best quality | 20.8 |
Closing takeaway
192-84-6 • 69.2% • 24 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
Ohio State 1995
SRS 28.2
Worst Season
Tulsa 1977
SRS -20.0
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 1978
22.5 SRS
106-49-11 • 67.2% • 18 seasons • 0 titles
-12.5 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
North Carolina 1948
SRS 25.8
Worst Season
Bucknell 1932
SRS -12.5
Biggest Improvement
Bucknell 1933
27.7 SRS