Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Dutch Stanley
Dutch Stanley: 42nd pct vs Jack Hegarty: 39th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Jack HegartyDutch Stanley
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
SimilarSimilar: Dutch Stanley vs Jack Hegarty
Dutch Stanley: 41st pct vs Jack Hegarty: 40th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Dutch Stanley
Dutch Stanley: 82nd pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dutch Stanley vs Jack Hegarty
Dutch Stanley: 0 titles vs Jack Hegarty: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dutch Stanley vs Jack Hegarty
Dutch Stanley: 3 seasons vs Jack Hegarty: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Clear edgeEdge: Dutch Stanley
Dutch Stanley: 51.7% vs Jack Hegarty: 46.2%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jack Hegarty
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Dutch Stanley
Insufficient sample
Raw avg SP Overall: —
—
Insufficient sample
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Jack HegartyDutch Stanley
EliteStrongAverageLean
1914Actual season year • SRS range -7.6 to 2.71935
Active comparison point
Jack Hegarty • 1914
1914 NC State
Best season2-3-1 • SRS 2.1 • SP Overall —
Win %
41.7%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Dutch Stanley
Nearest year 1933 • Florida
5-3-1 • SRS 2.7 • SP Overall —
Jack Hegarty trails by a 0.6-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Hegarty | |||||
| NC State | 1914-1915 | 2 | 5-6-2 | -2.0 | 2.1 |
| Dutch Stanley | |||||
| Florida | 1933-1935 | 3 | 14-13-2 | -2.1 | 2.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Similar overall level
Full profile →Jack Hegarty
5-6-2 • 46.2% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
NC State 1914
SRS 2.1
Worst Season
NC State 1915
SRS -6.1
Biggest Improvement
NC State 1915
-8.2 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Dutch Stanley
14-13-2 • 51.7% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
42nd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
Florida 1933
SRS 2.7
Worst Season
Florida 1935
SRS -7.6
Biggest Improvement
Florida 1934
-4.0 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.